<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" >

<channel>
	<title>Q 103 - Albany&#039;s #1 Rock Station &#187; paramount</title>
	<atom:link href="http://q103albany.com/tags/paramount/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://q103albany.com</link>
	<description>Albany&#039;s #1 Rock Station</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 02:30:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#039;Star Trek Into Darkness&#039; 3D Was Not Part of the J.J. Abrams Plan</title>
		<link>http://q103albany.com/star-trek-into-darkness-3d-jj-abrams/</link>
		<comments>http://q103albany.com/star-trek-into-darkness-3d-jj-abrams/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 01:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Walkuski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Celebrities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jj abrams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paramount]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star trek into darkness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screencrush.com/?p=75275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;To 3D or not to 3D?&#8221; is a question moviegoers often have to ask themselves when hitting the multiplex to see the latest blockbuster, but the debate doesn&#8217;t stop at the paying customer. Sometimes it&#8217;s the filmmakers themselves who are dubious about the technology, even as they work with it. This issue has come to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"To 3D or not to 3D?" is a question moviegoers often have to ask themselves when hitting the multiplex to see the latest blockbuster, but the debate doesn't stop at the paying customer. Sometimes it's the filmmakers themselves who are dubious about the technology, even as they work with it. This issue has come to light after <a href="http://screencrush.com/tags/jj-abrams/">J.J. Abrams</a> revealed that he himself was not sold on converting his latest, '<a href="http://screencrush.com/tags/star-trek-into-darkness/">Star Trek Into Darkness</a>,' into 3D initially. In fact, he had it forced upon him by the studio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://q103albany.com/star-trek-into-darkness-3d-jj-abrams/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://screencrush.com/files/2013/01/star_trek_into_darkness_3d_jj_abrams.jpg" height="420" width="640" /><media:description xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">Paramount Pictures</media:description>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weekend Box Office&#8211;Battle LA Tops &amp; Mars Flops</title>
		<link>http://q103albany.com/weekend-box-office-battle-la-tops-mars-flops/</link>
		<comments>http://q103albany.com/weekend-box-office-battle-la-tops-mars-flops/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 09:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BJ Ragone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pop Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[battle los angeles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[box]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mars needs moms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paramount]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rango]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red riding hood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://q103albany.com/?p=9501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Disney invested a lot of money into Mars Needs Moms, but are not seeing a very good return on it. Overall box office numbers were down about 13% but that is no excuse for the poor numbers that Disney&#8217;s latest effort, Mars Needs Moms, brought in.  It is a little more inventive than previous Disney [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disney invested a lot of money into <em>Mars Needs Moms</em>, but are not seeing a very good return on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://q103albany.com/weekend-box-office-battle-la-tops-mars-flops/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://wac.450F.edgecastcdn.net/80450F/q103albany.com/files/2011/03/109885466.jpg" height="3000" width="3933" /><media:description xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">Photo Courtesy Getty Images</media:description>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 776/806 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via wac.450F.edgecastcdn.net/80450F/q103albany.com

Served from: q103albany.com @ 2013-05-24 02:39:45 -->